Nominations Queries Post 1
Jan. 10th, 2020 02:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I was hoping to get all the tags for which there weren't any queries approved before posting one of these, but between the high pace at which people are nominating (a Good Thing) and the slow pace at which AO3 is letting me approve (a Bad Thing), I haven't yet got anywhere near, and I have a sufficiently large number of queries that doing this now seems worthwhile. If your fandom is not mentioned below and has not been approved yet, thank you for your continuing patience.
(NB: I am continuing to take people's thoughts on Original Works and the Silmarillion here until around 2200 UTC on Saturday.)
Specific fandom queries
- Harry Potter Wizarding World - No Pottermore - Teacher Character(s) (HP Wizarding World - No Pottermore) - is the intent of this effectively "Original Teacher Character(s)" or "your pick of any of the canon Hogwarts teachers"? I'd need a fair bit of convincing to approve the latter over a series of tags for named characters.
- Oblivion (2013) - several characters are nominated as "Any [character name]" - could the nominator expand on what's intended here? (I don't know this movie, and while it seems from the tags as though I should rectify that I don't have time to do so right now.)
- Outcast - Rosemary Sutcliff - Centurion headed to Dacia (Outcast) - is this a particular identifiable character within the narrative, or just a type of character? (If the latter, I think an "Original" in front might be warranted.)
Fandoms that will not currently be approved
John Wick (Movies) has been nominated with a slate consisting entirely of canonical character and relationship tags. Please see here for details of how worldbuildingex tags are structured - it is somewhat different from most other exchanges.
The Sixth World - Rebecca Roanhorse has no worldbuilding tags nominated. Please add one or more tags (starting "WB: " and using the relationship field) for worldbuilding elements you would like to see explored in fanworks - these can be as broad or as specific as you like.
Beyond these, there are a significant number of fandoms in tag set which do not have the two "default" character tags of "Any or No Character (Fandom)" and "Original Character(s) (Fandom)" nominated. These fandoms will not be approved until these two tags are added (if you are not the original nominator, but want to see these fandoms in the tag set, feel free to nominate them using any spare fandom slots you have).
Since I cannot currently see all of the remaining tags to be approved at once, I cannot be certain that the below is a complete list, but fandoms falling into this category include:
- DC's Legends of Tomorrow (TV)
- The Godwhale (TJ Bass)
- Serial Experiments Lain
- Silicon Valley (TV)
- Star Trek: The Original Series, Star Trek: The Next Generation AND Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
- Star Wars Sequel Trilogy
- Steven Universe (Cartoon)
- Veep (TV)
Please double check your tags!
Several of the fandoms that haven't yet been approved but are not mentioned above have missing or inconsistent disambiguations, or slight formatting variations (eg there seems to be at least one nominator using "None or Any Characters" instead of "Any or No Characters", and another prefacing worldbuilding tags with "DW: " instead of "WB: "). These are all things that I can (and eventually will) fix, but doing so slows down the rate of approvals even further - if you can assist by modifying them on your end that would be greatly appreciated.
ETA: Harry Potter
Something strange has happened to Harry Potter. I approved "Harry Potter - Books 1-7" and for some reason this seems to have brought "Harry Potter - J K Rowling" into "Already Approved Fandoms", even though it does not appear on the tag set, either the publicly visible version or the back end. I do not currently intend to approve "Harry Potter - J K Rowling" and I am now not at all certain that I would be able to do so even if I did. I do not think that this will have an impact on other Harry Potter tags nominated under other fandom names, but please be alert for possible weirdness and let me know if you spot anything.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 02:37 pm (UTC)(...you should definitely get acquainted with the film if you feel inclined and get the time. 💛)
no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 03:12 pm (UTC)The film is set in 2077, sixty years post-apocalypse. Jack and Vika 49, whom we spend most of the film with, are eventually revealed to be clones of the original Jack and Vika, who died in 2017. The characters themselves did not know this; they were kept from finding out about each other by the film's villain telling them not to cross into the 'radiation zones' where they might encounter each other.
Characters who speak to Jack 49 go into some detail about how he's different from other Jacks who have come before him, and his worldview is implied to be shaped by the books, records, clothes and other artifacts he finds in the ruins of New York. It's reasonable to assume that other Jacks, who patrol vastly different territories, might find different things there and therefore have different thoughts, different worldviews, and possibly even different ways of presenting themselves.
We later meet another Jack, Jack 52, who is clearly much younger and more anxious/less jaded in general than 'our' Jack.
At the end of the film, it's implied that the planet goes back to immediately-post-apocalypse conditions, and all the Jacks and Vikas will have to come to the surface to survive instead of living in their isolated high-tech towers in the zones they were earlier confined to. It's not inconceivable that some of them might encounter each other, and that in such a situation the various differences between them would come into play.
It's less evident in the film that the Vikas differ from one another than that the Jacks do; Vika 49 and Vika 52 are shown to be very similar (and Vika 49, at least, is somewhat of an abusive partner to Jack 49, but that's another story). However, we do meet the original Vika who died in 2017, and she's a lovely nerd who's very different from the Vika clones. I think, and there is at least one person in the fandom who agrees with me, that it's possible other Vika clones whom we didn't meet onscreen could have dealt with their trauma in different and healthier ways than the ones we do meet, and that it would be interesting to explore what makes that so.
Thanks for your patience! I hope this clarifies enough. 💛
no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-11 07:06 am (UTC)The missing canonical characters now are Jack Harper 52, Vika Olsen 52, Commander Jack Harper (the OG Jack), and Co-Pilot Victoria Olsen (the OG Vika).
no subject
Date: 2020-01-11 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-12 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-12 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-10 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-11 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-12 12:56 pm (UTC)Outcast - Rosemary Sutcliff
Date: 2020-01-12 03:51 pm (UTC)Not the person who nominated but the character "Centurion headed to Dacia (Outcast)" is an identifiable character from chapter 5 of the novel.
Re: Outcast - Rosemary Sutcliff
Date: 2020-01-12 09:18 pm (UTC)